John Stuart mill on induction and hypotheses

Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):69-83 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A study of the development of Mill's thought through successive editions of _A System of Logic. His view of the genesis of most scientific laws, it is argued, progressively shifted from inductivism to hypothetico-deductivism. Mill's analysis of hypotheses and of methods for their assessment is considered in detail. New light is shed on relations between Mill's metascience and that of William Whewell

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#199,151)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Struan Jacobs
London School of Economics (PhD)

Citations of this work

The Mill-Whewell Debate: Much Ado about Induction.Laura J. Snyder - 1997 - Perspectives on Science 5 (2):159-198.
John Stuart mill.Fred Wilson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Inductivism in Practice: Experiment in John Herschel’s Philosophy of Science.Aaron D. Cobb - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (1):21-54.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references