Philosophy Compass 1 (3):303-316 (2006)
The term ‘logical form’ has been called on to serve a wide range of purposes in philosophy, and it would be too ambitious to try to survey all of them in a single essay. Instead, I will focus on just one conception of logical form that has occupied a central place in the philosophy of language, and in particular in the philosophical study of linguistic meaning. This is what I will call the classical conception of logical form. The classical conception, as I will present it in section 1, has (either explicitly or implicitly) shaped a great deal of important philosophical work in semantic theory. But it has come under fire in recent decades, and in sections 2 and 3 I will discuss two of the recent challenges that I take to be most interesting and significant
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory.Richard Larson & Gabriel Segal - 1995 - MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Structural Entailment and Semantic Natural Kinds.Brendan Balcerak Jackson - 2017 - Linguistics and Philosophy 40 (3):207-237.
Similar books and articles
What is Logical Form?Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig - 2002 - In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Clarendon Press. pp. 54--90.
Logical Form.Christopher Menzel - 1998 - In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
Language, Cognition, and the Nature of Modularity: Evidence From Aphasia.Rosemary Varley & Michael Siegal - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):702-703.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads108 ( #45,634 of 2,164,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,020 of 2,164,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?