Modal Objection to Naive Leibnizian Identity

History and Philosophy of Logic 32 (2):107 - 118 (2011)
Abstract
This essay examines an argument of perennial importance against naive Leibnizian absolute identity theory, originating with Ruth Barcan in 1947 (Barcan, R. 1947. ?The identity of individuals in a strict functional 3 calculus of second order?, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12, 12?15), and developed by Arthur Prior in 1962 (Prior, A.N. 1962. Formal Logic. Oxford: The Clarendon Press), presented here in the form offered by Nicholas Griffin in his 1977 book, Relative Identity (Griffin, N. 1977. Relative Identity. Oxford: The Clarendon Press). The objection considers the property of being necessarily identical to a specific object a as a counterexample to Leibnizian identity conditions, and more particularly to the indiscernibility of identicals, when it is only contingently true that a=b. The inquiry eliminates necessity and reference to a specifically designated object as responsible for the counterexample, leaving only identity. The requirements for an exact reinterpretation of Leibniz's Law in light of counterexamples involving converse intentional properties and the family of properties suggested by the property of being necessarily identical to a where a=b (or an equivalent definite descriptor variation) is only logically contingently true, are formalized in a more powerful, counterexample-resistant version of Leibniz's Law that does not succumb to relative identity as a necessary alternative motivated by desperation over the failure of the absolute identity principle
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445340.2010.524492
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,975
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
From a Logical Point of View.W. V. Quine - 1953 - Harvard University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):5-26.
Relative Identity.Nicholas Griffin - 1977 - Clarendon Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Subsumption and Relative Identity.P. Garbacz - 2004 - Axiomathes 14 (4):341-360.
'Identity' Without Identity.Alessandro Torza - 2012 - Mind 121 (481):67-95.
The Identity of Clones.Kathinka Evers - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):67 – 76.
Natural Kinds and the Identity of Property.Chang Seong Hong - 1998 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):89-98.
Weakly Classical Theories of Identity.Joshua Schechter - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):607-644.
Identity.Giselle Walker & E. S. Leedham-Green (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
A Fregean Solution to the Paradox of Analysis.Dale Jacquette - 1990 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:59-73.
Absolute Identity/Unity.Dietmar von der Pfordten - 2009 - Review of Metaphysics 62 (4):803-818.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-12

Total downloads

28 ( #173,782 of 2,063,224 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #245,334 of 2,063,224 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums