Observations, Simulations, and Reasoning in Astrophysics

Philosophy of Science 87 (5):1209-1220 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Astrophysics faces methodological challenges as a result of being a predominantly observation-based science without access to traditional experiments. In light of these challenges, astrophysicists frequently rely on computer simulations. Using collisional ring galaxies as a case study, I argue that computer simulations play three roles in reasoning in astrophysics: (1) hypothesis testing, (2) exploring possibility space, and (3) amplifying observations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The case of the missing satellites.Katia Wilson - 2017 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 21):1-21.
Are computer simulations experiments? And if not, how are they related to each other?Claus Beisbart - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (2):171-204.
The Dark Galaxy Hypothesis.Michael Weisberg, Melissa Jacquart, Barry Madore & Marja Seidel - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (5):1204-1215.
The modern paradigm shift in basic science: conceptual meaning.T. V. Gorbatiuk - 2012 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 1:8-12.
Seeing Things: The Philosophy of Reliable Observation.Robert Hudson - 2013 - Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Creating Convincing Simulations in Astrophysics. [REVIEW]Mikaela Sundberg - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (1):64-87.
How can computer simulations produce new knowledge?Claus Beisbart - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3):395-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-16

Downloads
56 (#279,626)

6 months
13 (#182,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Melissa Jacquart
University of Cincinnati

Citations of this work

Methodological reflections on the MOND/dark matter debate.Patrick M. Duerr & William J. Wolf - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 101 (C):1-23.
Nested modalities in astrophysical modeling.Elena Castellani & Giulia Schettino - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (1):1-20.
Independent evidence in multi-messenger astrophysics.Jamee Elder - 2024 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 104 (C):119-129.

Add more citations