Sensibility theory and projectivism

In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 186--218 (2006)
Abstract
This chapter explores the debate between contemporary projectivists or expressivists, and the advocates of sensibility theory. Both positions are best viewed as forms of sentimentalism — the theory that evaluative concepts must be explicated by appeal to the sentiments. It argues that the sophisticated interpretation of such notions as “true” and “objective” that are offered by defenders of these competing views ultimately undermines the significance of their meta-ethical disputes over “cognitivism” and “realism” about value. Their fundamental disagreement lies in moral psychology; it concerns how best to understand the emotions to which sentimentalist theories must appeal.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/0195147790.003.0008
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,786
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Sentimentalism and Moral Dilemmas.András Szigeti - 2015 - Dialectica 69 (1):1-22.
Why Do People Behave Immorally When Drunk?Joseph Heath & Benoit Hardy-Vallée - 2015 - Philosophical Explorations 18 (3):310-329.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mencius, Hume, and Sensibility Theory.Xiusheng Liu - 2002 - Philosophy East and West 52 (1):75-97.
Projectivism and Error in Hume's Ethics.Jonas Olson - 2011 - Hume Studies 37 (1):19-42.
Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste.Theodore Gracyk - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Is Moral Projectivism Empirically Tractable?Richard Joyce - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (1):53 - 75.
Projections and Relations.R. M. Sainsbury - 1998 - The Monist 81 (1):133-160.
So Forward to Imagine.Timothy M. Costelloe - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:117-122.
Quasi-Realism, Sensibility Theory, and Ethical Relativism.Simon Kirchin - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):413 – 427.
Nehamas on Beauty and Love.Berys Gaut - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):199-204.
Kant and the Aesthetics of Nature.Alexander Rueger - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):138-155.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
150 ( #36,274 of 2,231,532 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #34,832 of 2,231,532 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature