The epistemological objection to opaque teleological theories of content

In Graham Macdonald & David Papineau (eds.), Teleosemantics. Oxford University Press. pp. 85--99 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,912

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Teleology, consequentialism, and the past.Peter Vallentyne - 1988 - Journal of Value Inquiry 22 (2):89-101.
Reconsidering perceptual content.William T. Wojtach - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (1):22-43.
The teleological theory of content.David Braddon-Mitchell & Frank Jackson - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (4):474-89.
General-purpose content.Carolyn Price - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):123-133.
Teleosemantics and indeterminacy.David Papineau - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (1):1-14.
The status of teleological theories of content.Ming Tan - 2002 - Philosophical Writings 21:25-37.


Added to PP

28 (#432,391)

6 months
2 (#319,667)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Jackson
Australian National University

Citations of this work

What is Locke's Theory of Representation?Walter Ott - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (6):1077-1095.
Adaptation and its Analogues: Biological Categories for Biosemantics.Hajo Greif - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90:298-307.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references