The Inflexibility of Relative Truth

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):409-418 (2010)
Abstract
The ideology of relative truth is inflexible in two ways. Firstly, what's true-for-J is closed under entailment. This is a problem for using truth-relativism to solve the preface puzzle about knowledge. Secondly, it is plausible that vagueness gives rise to some questions having multiple ‘acceptable’ answers, and other questions having no ‘acceptable’ answer. Even if truth-relativism can express the former idea, it can't express the latter. I propose an ideology that is not so rigid. It is preferable to relative truth
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2010.00295.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,141
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and Lotteries.John Hawthorne - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Truth and Objectivity.Crispin Wright - 1992 - Harvard University Press.
The Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.John MacFarlane - 2005 - In Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 197--234.
Contextualism and Relativism.Mark Richard - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 119 (1-2):215-242.
Wang's Paradox.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):201--32.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Truth in the Garden of Forking Paths.John MacFarlane - 2008 - In Max K”Obel & Manuel Garcia-Carpintero (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 81--102.
Relative Truth and the First Person.Friederike Moltmann - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (2):187-220..
Relative Truth Definability of Axiomatic Truth Theories.Kentaro Fujimoto - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):305-344.
What is Quine's View of Truth?Donald Davidson - 1994 - Inquiry 37 (4):437 – 440.
Three Kinds of Relativism.Paul Boghossian - 2011 - In Steven Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Blackwell.
Assertion, Belief and Disagreement: A Problem for Truth-Relativism.Sebastiano Moruzzi - 2008 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 207.
Time Dilation, Context, and Relative Truth.Ángel Pinillos - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (1):65-92.
Relative Correctness.Teresa Marques - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):361-373.
Semantic Relativism and the Logic of Indexicals.Stefano Predelli & Isidora Stojanovic - 2008 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 63--90.
A Consistent Relativism.Steven D. Hales - 1997 - Mind 106 (421):33-52.
MacFarlane on Relative Truth.Richard Heck - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):88–100.
Three Forms of Truth-Relativism.Iris Einheuser - 2008 - In Manuel Garcia-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 187-203.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-21

Total downloads

30 ( #169,935 of 2,163,620 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,040 of 2,163,620 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums