Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):359 - 360 (2013)

Abstract
We welcome the proposal to use forward models to understand predictive processes in language processing. However, Pickering & Garrod (P&G) miss the opportunity to provide a strong framework for future work. Forward models need to be pursued in the context of learning. This naturally leads to questions about what prediction error these models aim to minimize
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x12002762
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,262
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Expectation-Based Syntactic Comprehension.Roger Levy - 2008 - Cognition 106 (3):1126-1177.
Becoming Syntactic.Franklin Chang, Gary S. Dell & Kathryn Bock - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (2):234-272.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Better Theories.Howard Darmstadter - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (1):20-27.
Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
An Antirealist Explanation of the Success of Science.P. Kyle Stanford - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):266-284.
Reflexive Predictions.Roger C. Buck - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (4):359-369.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
43 ( #251,238 of 2,455,611 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,316 of 2,455,611 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes