Can we see natural kind properties?

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 44 (2):183-205 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Which properties can we visually experience? Some authors hold that we can experience only low-level properties such as color, illumination, shape, spatial location, and motion. Others believe that we can also experience high-level properties, such as being a dog or being a pine tree. On the basis of her method of phenomenal contrast, Susanna Siegel has recently defended the latter view. One of her central claims is that we can best account for certain phenomenal contrasts if we assume that we can visually experience natural kind properties. In this paper, I argue that certain kinds of low-level properties, namely shape-gestalt properties, can explain these phenomenal contrasts just as well as high-level properties. If successful, this is a modest, but nevertheless significant result. Even though it does not prove the falsity of Siegel’s proposal, it nevertheless secures the existence of a plausible alternative.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Visual Contents: Beyond Reach?Kristjan Laasik - 2015 - Philosophical Forum 46 (2):193-204.
Representing high-level properties in perceptual experience.Parker Crutchfield - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):279 - 294.
On Experiencing High-Level Properties.Indrek Reiland - 2014 - American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):177-187.
Phenomenal properties as dummy properties.Richard J. Hall - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (2):199 - 223.
In Defence of a Doxastic Account of Experience.Kathrin Glüer - 2009 - Mind and Language 24 (3):297-327.
Perceptual phenomenology.Bence Nanay - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):235-246.
Do We Perceive Natural Kind Properties?Berit Brogaard - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (1):35 - 42.
Cognitive Penetration and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.Robert Briscoe - 2015 - In Athanassios Raftopoulos & John Zeimbekis (eds.), Cognitive Penetrability. Oxford University Press.
Experience and Intentional Content.Ian Phillips - 2005 - Dissertation, Oxford University
Phenomenal Contrast: A Critique.Ole Koksvik - 2015 - American Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):321-334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-18

Downloads
142 (#127,833)

6 months
11 (#222,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rene Jagnow
University of Georgia

Citations of this work

Twofoldness and Three-Layeredness in Pictorial Representation.Alberto Voltolini - 2018 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 55 (1):89-111.
Perceptual Kinds as Supervening Sortals.Błażej Skrzypulec - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (1):174-201.
Cognitive penetrability and late vision.Alberto Voltolini - 2020 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 11 (3):363-371.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Action in Perception.Alva Noë - 2004 - MIT Press.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Reference and Consciousness.John Campbell - 2002 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 74 references / Add more references