Discontinuing Life Support in an Infant of a Drug-Addicted Mother: Whose Decision Is It?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (1):48-54 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Ethical dilemmas…are rarely simple and stark but are, instead, multifaceted, complex, and gut wrenching for parents and care givers alike.” This is never more the case than when one must treat vulnerable babies who are not, nor ever can be competent to offer us some guidance about that treatment. The ethical problems are heightened when the parents, or the single mother, are incompetent to make decisions themselves, for example, because of drug addiction. In such cases, when the baby is premature and suffering the effects of the drugs the mother has taken, and the mother herself is either no longer available for consultation or so damaged by her own addiction that she is not a reliable decisionmaker, the usual trend In the United States is to initiate treatment and continue until it is virtually certain that the infant will die.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Drug addiction and criminal responsibility.Jeanette Kennett, Nicole A. Vincent & Anke Snoek - 2014 - In Neil Levy & Jens Clausen (eds.), Handbook on Neuroethics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 1065-1083.
The Place of Proximity.Brooke A. Scelza - 2011 - Human Nature 22 (1-2):108-127.
On discontinuing dialysis.J. Wight - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (2):77-81.
The early crying paradox.Ronald G. Barr - 1990 - Human Nature 1 (4):355-389.
Function of infant-directed speech.Marilee Monnot - 1999 - Human Nature 10 (4):415-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
31 (#488,695)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?