Bridgman and the Normative Independence of Science: An Individual Physicist in the Shadow of the Bomb

Synthese 203 (141):1-24 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Physicist Percy Bridgman has been taken by Heather Douglas to be an exemplar defender of an untenable value-free ideal for science. This picture is complicated by a detailed study of Bridgman's philosophical views of the relation between science and society. The normative autonomy of science, a version of the value-free ideal, is defended. This restriction on the provenance of permissible values in science is given a basis in Bridgman's broader philosophical commitments, most importantly, his view that science is primarily an individual commitment to a set of epistemic norms and values. Considerations of external moral or social values are not, on this view, intrinsic to scientific practice, though they have a broader pragmatic significance. What Bridgman takes as the proper relation between science and society is shown through analysis of his many writings on the topic and consideration of his rarely remarked upon involvement in the most problematic example of "Big Science" of his day: the atomic bomb. A reevaluation of Bridgman's views provides a unique characterization of what is at stake in the values in science debate: the normative autonomy of science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
n/a

Downloads
285 (#87,225)

6 months
139 (#31,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mahmoud Jalloh
St. John's College, Santa Fe

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations