Metaphysics and Convention in Dimensional Analysis, 1914-1917

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 14 (2):275-322 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper recovers an important, century-old debate regarding the methodological and metaphysical foundations of dimensional analysis. Consideration of Richard Tolman's failed attempt to install the principle of similitude---the relativity of size---as the founding principle of dimensional analysis both clarifies the method of dimensional analysis and articulates two metaphysical positions regarding quantity dimensions. Tolman's position is quantity dimension fundamentalism. This is a commitment to dimensional realism and a set of fundamental dimensions which ground all further dimensions. The opposing position, developed primarily by Bridgman, is quantity dimension conventionalism. Conventionalism is an anti-realism regarding dimensional structure, holding our non-representational dimensional systems have basic quantity dimensions fixed only by convention. This metaphysical dispute was left somewhat unsettled. It is shown here that both of these positions face serious problems: fundamentalists are committed to surplus dimensional structure; conventionalists cannot account for empirical constraints on our dimensional systems nor the empirical success of dimensional analysis. It is shown that an alternative position is available which saves what is right in both: quantity dimension functionalism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The Bridgman-Tolman-Warburton Correspondence on Dimensional Analysis, 1934.Mahmoud Jalloh - 2024 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science.
Dimensions.S. Sterrett - 2022 - In Eleanor Knox & Alastair Wilson (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Physics. London, UK: Routledge.
In Defence of Dimensions.Caspar Jacobs - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
On the nature of dimensions.Brian Ellis - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (4):357-380.
How dimensional analysis can explain.Mark Pexton - 2014 - Synthese 191 (10):2333-2351.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-09

Downloads
199 (#125,987)

6 months
140 (#33,459)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mahmoud Jalloh
St. John's College, Santa Fe

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.
Laws and Symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 182 (3):327-329.
Dynamics of Reason.Michael Friedman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):702-712.

View all 28 references / Add more references