Advertising ethics: Practitioner and student perspectives

Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (2):69 – 83 (1994)

Abstract
This study examines the self-reported ethics of both current and future advertising practitioners, and compares their responses to four scenarios and 17 statements on advertising ethics. Stepwise discriminant analysis was used to determine the extent to which both groups applied the classical ethical theory of deontology to the scenarios and statements. Results indicate significant differences between both groups. For example, current advertising practitioners are significantly less likely than future practitioners to apply deontology to decision making. The implications of these results are discussed and suggestions for future research are outlined.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1207/s15327728jmme0902_1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,386
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Persuasive Advertising, Autonomy, and the Creation of Desire.Roger Crisp - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):413 - 418.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Media Ethics Classroom and Learning to Minimize Harm.Sharon Logsdon Yoder & Glen L. Bleske - 1997 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 12 (4):227 – 242.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
115 ( #69,858 of 2,271,929 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #562,954 of 2,271,929 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature