Biological pluralism and homology

Philosophy of Science 72 (5):687-698 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The study of similarity is fundamental to biological inquiry. Many homology concepts have been formulated that function successfully to explain similarity in their native domains, but fail to provide an overarching account applicable to variably interconnected and independent areas of biological research despite the monistic standpoint from which they originate. The use of multiple, explicitly articulated homology concepts, applicable at different levels of the biological hierarchy, allows a more thorough investigation of the nature of biological similarity. Responsible epistemological pluralism as advocated herein is generative of fruitful and innovative biological research, and is appropriate given the metaphysical pluralism that underpins all of biology

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#241,176)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The fine structure of ‘homology’.Aaron Novick - 2018 - Biology and Philosophy 33 (1-2):6.
Abstraction in ecology: reductionism and holism as complementary heuristics.Jani Raerinne - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8 (3):395-416.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Fate of Knowledge.Helen E. Longino - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunuty of Science.[author unknown] - 1995 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 68 (3):84-86.

Add more references