Rivista di Estetica 64:118-133 (2017)

Authors
Ian James Kidd
Nottingham University
Abstract
The discipline of academic philosophy suffers from serious problems of diversity and inclusion whose acknowledgement and amelioration are often resisted by members of our profession. In this paper, I distinguish four main modes of resistance—naiveté, conservatism, pride, and hostility—and describe how and why they manifest by using them as the basis for a typology of types of ‘resister’. This typology can hopefully be useful to those of us trying to counteract such resistance in ways sensitive to the different motives and strategies that these resisters tend to employ.
Keywords sexism  racism  gender diversity  inclusion  discrimination  activism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4000/estetica.2071
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change?Katrina Hutchison & Fiona Jenkins (eds.) - 2013 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Diversity: An Ethical Question with Competing Rationales.Mark Winston - 2014 - Journal of Information Ethics 23 (1):83-100.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-04

Total views
264 ( #35,909 of 2,448,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #29,336 of 2,448,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes