What is direct perceptual knowledge? A fivefold confusion

Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):1-16 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When philosophers speak of direct perceptual knowledge, they obviously mean to suggest that such knowledge is unmediated ? but unmediated by what? This is where we find evidence of violent disagreement. To clarify matters, I want to identify and briefly describe several important senses of "direct" that have helped shape our understanding of perceptual knowledge. They are (1) "Direct" as Non-Inferential Perception; (2) "Direct" as Unmediating by Objects of Perception; (3) "Direct" as Conceptually Unmediated Perception; (4) "Direct" as Independent Verification of Perceptual Beliefs; and (5) "Direct" as Perception of What is Epistemically Prior.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sellars' critical direct realism.Steven M. Levine - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):53 – 76.
The mystery of direct perceptual justification.Peter Markie - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (3):347-373.
Skepticism and the Veil of Perception.Michael Huemer (ed.) - 2001 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Introduction: Perceptual experience.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2006 - In John Hawthorne & Tamar Szabó Gendler (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press. pp. 1--30.
Perceiving empirical objects directly.Robert G. Hudson - 2000 - Erkenntnis 52 (3):357-371.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#180,506)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas McDermid
Trent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references