Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (1):115-136 (2001)
There are two principles which bear the name Frege''sprinciple: the principle of compositionality, and the contextprinciple. The aim of this contribution is to investigate whether thisis justified: did Frege accept both principles at the same time, did hehold the one principle but not the other, or did he, at some moment,change his opinion? The conclusion is as follows. There is a developmentin Frege''s position. In the period of Grundlagen he followed to a strict form of contextuality. He repeatedcontextuality in later writings, but became less strict. From 1914 on,pushed by the needs of research, he comes close to compositionality. Buthe could never make the final step toward compositionality forprincipled reasons, therefore he always would reject compositionality.
|Keywords||compositionality contextuality Frege history of logic history of philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Expressivism, Relativism, and the Analytic Equivalence Test.María José Frápolli & Neftalí Villanueva - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6 (1788).
Frege, the Identity ofSinnand Carnap's Intension.I. Hanzel - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (3):229-247.
Similar books and articles
Why Rationalist Compositionality Won't Go Away (Either).Víctor M. Verdejo - 2009 - Theoria 24 (1):29-47.
Two Spurious Varieties of Compositionality.Manuel Garcia-Carpintero - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (2):159-72.
Is Compositionality an a Priori Principle?Daniel Cohnitz - 2005 - In M. Wening, E. Machery & G. Schurz (eds.), The Compositionality of Concepts and Meanings: Foundational Issues. Ontos.
Senses of Compositionality and Compositionality of Senses.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2009 - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 8:86-104.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads69 ( #75,542 of 2,163,866 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,866 )
How can I increase my downloads?