Independent choices and the interpretation of IF logic

Abstract
In this paper it is argued that Hintikka's game theoreticalsemantics for Independence Friendly logic does not formalize theintuitions about independent choices; it rather is aformalization of imperfect information. Furthermore it is shownthat the logic has several remarkable properties (e.g.,renaming of bound variables is not allowed). An alternativesemantics is proposed which formalizes intuitions aboutindependence
Keywords branching quantifier  game theoretical semantics  Henkin quantifier  IF logic  imperfect information  independent choices
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1015542413718
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,786
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On Existential Declarations of Independence in If Logic.Fausto Barbero - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):254-280.
How Indefinites Choose Their Scope.Adrian Brasoveanu & Donka F. Farkas - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):1-55.
Epistemic Operators in Dependence Logic.Pietro Galliani - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (2):367-397.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
18 ( #308,601 of 2,231,535 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #264,176 of 2,231,535 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature