Independent choices and the interpretation of IF logic

Abstract
In this paper it is argued that Hintikka's game theoreticalsemantics for Independence Friendly logic does not formalize theintuitions about independent choices; it rather is aformalization of imperfect information. Furthermore it is shownthat the logic has several remarkable properties (e.g.,renaming of bound variables is not allowed). An alternativesemantics is proposed which formalizes intuitions aboutindependence
Keywords branching quantifier  game theoretical semantics  Henkin quantifier  IF logic  imperfect information  independent choices
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1015542413718
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
How Indefinites Choose Their Scope.Adrian Brasoveanu & Donka F. Farkas - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (1):1-55.
Epistemic Operators in Dependence Logic.Pietro Galliani - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (2):367-397.
On Existential Declarations of Independence in If Logic.Fausto Barbero - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):254-280.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

16 ( #296,330 of 2,164,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums