Philosophia Mathematica 9 (2):129-153 (2001)
In this paper an attempt is made to present Skolem's argument, for the relativity of some set-theoretical notions as a sensible one. Skolem's critique of set theory is seen as part of a larger argument to the effect that no conclusive evidence has been given for the existence of uncountable sets. Some replies to Skolem are discussed and are shown not to affect Skolem's position, since they all presuppose the existence of uncountable sets. The paper ends with an assessment of the assumptions on which Skolem's argument rests from a present-day perspective.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
The Mathematics of Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2006 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic. North Holland. pp. 615--648.
In the Shadows of the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem: Early Combinatorial Analyses of Mathematical Proofs.Jan Von Plato - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):189-225.
Skolem and the Löwenheim-Skolem Theorem: A Case Study of the Philosophical Significance of Mathematical Results.Alexander George - 1985 - History and Philosophy of Logic 6 (1):75-89.
Ontological Relativity Considered: Quine on Löwenheim-Skolem, Davidson on Quine.H. Hrachovec - 2005 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 24 (2).
An Axiom Schema of Comprehension of Zermelo–Fraenkel–Skolem Set Theory.Johannes Heidema - 1990 - History and Philosophy of Logic 11 (1):59-65.
Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2009 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads90 ( #57,516 of 2,169,725 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,217 of 2,169,725 )
How can I increase my downloads?