The agreement to keep our agreements: Hume, Prichard, and Searle

Philosophical Papers 23 (2):75-87 (1994)

Authors
Jan Narveson
University of Waterloo
Abstract
Does it make sense, and is it at all plausible, to view the moral obligation to keep particular promises and do what is called for by particular agreements such as contracts as being founded on a general "Social Contract" -- i.e., to give a contractarian account of promise-keeping? This paper argues that it does. Borrowing from Hume, David Lewis, Gilbert Harman, and David Gauthier, I provide a sketch of what the "social contract" is (not, e.g., either a real or a hypothetical meeting of all with all) -- namely, a form of commitment, makable by any individual, but with commitment likewise to social reinforcement. Then it is argued that Searle's familiar thesis is in error in that it leaves out the latter factor as well as implicitly calling for a version of the former. Then it is argued that this general understanding of morality can reasonably issue in a specific rule about agreements that would be one among others in a contractarian moral platform
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/05568649409506414
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,049
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is an Agreement an Exchange of Promises?Margaret Gilbert - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (12):627-649.
Are Coerced Agreements Involuntary?Michael Philips - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (1):133 - 145.
Terms of Agreement.Kent Bach - 1995 - Ethics 105 (3):604-612.
PhilipS on Coerced Agreements.Joan McGregor - 1988 - Law and Philosophy 7 (2):225 - 236.
Is an Agreement an Exchange of Intentions?Joe Mintoff - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):44–67.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
41 ( #201,373 of 2,260,175 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #400,948 of 2,260,175 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature