Autonomy-based criticisms of the patient preference predictor

Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (5):304-310 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The patient preference predictor is a proposed computer-based algorithm that would predict the treatment preferences of decisionally incapacitated patients. Incorporation of a PPP into the decision-making process has the potential to improve implementation of the substituted judgement standard by providing more accurate predictions of patients’ treatment preferences than reliance on surrogates alone. Yet, critics argue that methods for making treatment decisions for incapacitated patients should be judged on a number of factors beyond simply providing them with the treatments they would have chosen for themselves. These factors include the extent to which the decision-making process recognises patients’ freedom to choose and relies on evidence the patient themselves would take into account when making treatment decisions. These critics conclude that use of a PPP should be rejected on the grounds that it is inconsistent with these factors, especially as they relate to proper respect for patient autonomy. In this paper, we review and evaluate these criticisms. We argue that they do not provide reason to reject use of a PPP, thus supporting efforts to develop a full-scale PPP and to evaluate it in practice. There are no data in this work.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sovereignty, authenticity and the patient preference predictor.Ben Schwan - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (5):311-312.
Autonomy, shared agency and prediction.Sungwoo Um - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (5):313-314.
Reflections on the Patient Preference Predictor Proposal.D. W. Brock - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):153-160.
Law, Ethics, and the Patient Preference Predictor.R. Dresser - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):178-186.
Patient Preference Predictors, Apt Categorization, and Respect for Autonomy.S. John - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (2):169-177.
Some comments on the substituted judgement standard.Dan Egonsson - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (1):33-40.
Shared decision-making and patient autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Precedent autonomy and subsequent consent.John K. Davis - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):267-291.


Added to PP

27 (#592,811)

6 months
15 (#171,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile