Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (2):207 - 234 (2007)
This paper contributes to the study of explicit performative utterances in the following ways. First, it presents arguments that support Austin’s view that these utterances are not assertions. In doing so, it offers an original explanation of why they cannot be true or false. Second, it puts forward a new analysis of explicit performatives as cases of showing performing, rather than of instances of asserting or declaring that one is performing a particular act. Finally, it develops a new account of the role of the performative prefix in signalling performative intentions that shows how the prefix can play a special role in the interpretation of performatives utterances.
|Keywords||Explicit performative utterances Showing Pragmatics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Hereby Explained: An Event-Based Account of Performative Utterances. [REVIEW]Regine Eckardt - 2012 - Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (1):21-55.
Similar books and articles
Performatives and Verifiability by the Use of Language.Lennart Åqvist - 1971 - Uppsala, Filosofiska Föreningen Och Filosofiska Institutionen Vid Uppsala Universitet.
Performatives and Descriptions.Gerard A. Radnitzky - 1962 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):12 – 45.
Explicit Performative Utterances and Statements.Jane Heal - 1974 - Philosophical Quarterly 24 (95):106-121.
Model Theoretic Semantics of Performatives.Anna Szabolcsi - 1982 - In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Hungarian General Linguistics. Benjamins.
Truth Valuation of Explicit Performatives.J. Houston - 1970 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):139-149.
Some Remarks on Performatives in the Law.Lennart Åqvist - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):105-124.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #67,971 of 2,168,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,837 of 2,168,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?