Phenomenal Qualities as Neurofunctional States

Dissertation, University of Southern California (1996)
Abstract
My goal is to provide a friendly account of how phenomenal qualities fit with a realist, physicalist world view. I argue that neurofunctionalism is both the most intuitive, and the most respectable position available. Functionalists and type-materialists have been arguing across purposes, and the best motivation for either of these views is the manifest implausibility of the other. Neurofunctionalism, however, avoids the alleged chauvinism of materialism--as well its serious epistemological shortcomings--while at the same time avoiding the notorious qualia-based objections to functionalism. Phenomenal concepts are indeed functional--they claim to pick out some functional kind--but the functional essence of the corresponding states can only be discovered through empirical neuroscience. ;The first two chapters try to further the discussion of some traditional qualia-based objections to analytic functionalism. Chapter 1 addresses the inverted spectrum problem, and concedes that the possibility of qualia inversions flouts strong intuitions about the 'fit' between a quale and psychological role. However, the functionalist cannot do justice to such intuitions, and new counterexamples emerge. Chapter 2 discusses the possibility of absent qualia, and Shoemaker's argument that such cases are impossible. I recast the argument as a incompatibility between the absent qualia hypothesis and a plausible form of weak incorrigibility. I argue that there are enough epistemic asymmetries between the cases that I can enjoy weak incorrigibility even if my functional twin does not. Chapter 3 argues for the conceptual possibility of multiple realizations. Even if mental concepts are demonstrative in nature, they can be analyzed to reveal the impossibility of ersatz pain. Hence type-materialism is false. Neurofunctionalism is introduced as superior to the alternatives. Chapter 4 addresses Goldman's problem of providing a plausible functionalist account of self-ascription. Typical versions of functionalism inevitably make the phenomenal essence of the state epiphenomenal to introspection, which is absurd. Neurofunctionalism plausibly avoids this problem. Chapter 5 turns to a number of puzzling issues internal to the intuitive notion a qualia, and assesses Dennett's case for eliminativism. Finally, the appendix to chapter 5 offers a solution to the problem of phi-motion
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2015-02-07

Total downloads
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
My notes
Sign in to use this feature