Philosophy of Science 68 (4):545-564 (2001)
Polanyi's and Popper's defenses of the status quo in science are explored and criticized. According to Polanyi, science resembles a hierarchical and tradition-oriented republic and is necessarily conservative; according to Popper's political philosophy the best republic is social democratic and reformist. By either philosopher's lights science is not a model republic; yet each claims it to be so. Both authors are inconsistent in failing to apply their own ideals. Both underplay the extent to which science depends upon the wider society; and neither makes sufficient allowance for the ways it can disrupt the social order. Polanyi even demands extraterritorial exemption for science from the scrutiny of incompetent outsiders. In their different ways, each minimizes the problems of institutionalized science and fails to consider the value, even the long-term necessity, for science of democratic criticism and control. Transnational control of science is an open challenge for democratic polities
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Scientific Dimensions of Social Knowledge and Their Distant Echoes in 20th-Century American Philosophy of Science.Philip Mirowski - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):283-326.
Relations Between Karl Popper and Michael Polanyi.Struan Jacobs & Phil Mullins - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):426-435.
Similar books and articles
A New “Essential Tension” for Rationality and Culture. What Happens If Politics Tries to Encounter Science Again.Salvatore Vasta - 2010 - Axiomathes 20 (1):129-143.
Preserving a Good Political Order and a Democratic Republic: Reflections From Philosophy, Great Thinkers, Popes and America's Founding Era.Stephen M. Krason - 1998 - Edwin Mellen Press.
Medical Ethics in the German Democratic Republic.Ernst Luther - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):289-299.
The Essential Tension in Science and Democracy.David Guston - 1993 - Social Epistemology 7 (1):3 – 23.
Ethics in Reproductive Medicine in the German Democratic Republic.Hannelore Koerner - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):335-341.
Ian C. Jarvie, The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science 1935â1945. [REVIEW]Jordi Cat - 2003 - Metascience 12 (1):75-77.
Essay Review ofThe Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science.John Wettersten - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (1):108-121.
Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science.Mary Jo Nye - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.
I. C. Jarvie: The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science 1935–1945,.reviewed John Wettersten - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (1):108-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #399,160 of 2,158,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #353,777 of 2,158,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?