Some remarks on the 'objective' and 'subjective' interpretations of the attributes

This paper is an attempt to clarify the 'objective' and 'subjective' interpretations of Spinoza's position on the attributes of substance. It is argued that (a) the dispute between objectivists and subjectivists survives resolution of the question concerning correct translation of 'tanquam' in definition iv, Part I of the Ethics , (b) the objective interpretation, unlike the subjective one, requires rejection of the notion of 'absolute' identity, unless Spinoza's position is inconsistent, and (c) the subjective interpretation is best characterized as holding that, although each attribute constitutes the essence of substance, there is only a (Suarezean) distinction of reasoned reason (distinctio rationis ratiocinatae) between the attributes, and between any attribute and God. (Spinoza will depart from Suarez, however, in holding that there can be a distinction of reasoned reason between A and B , when the concepts of and are adequate [or clear and distinct].) The dispute is thus held -to concern Spinoza's conception of identity, and the objectivity of the distinction between the attributes, not the objectivity of the attributes themselves. A partial defense of the subjective interpretation, when conceived in the above way, is then provided.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201747708601827
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,827
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Spinoza's Thinking Substance and the Necessity of Modes.Karolina Hübner - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (3):3-34.
The Two-Sense Reading of Spinoza’s Definition of Attribute.Ioannis Trisokkas - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1093-1115.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Subjective Reasons.Eric Vogelstein - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):239-257.
The False Dichotomy Between Objective and Subjective Interpretations of Spinoza's Theory of Attributes.Noa Shein - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (3):505 – 532.
Subjective and Objective.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press. pp. 207-222.
Spinoza on the Essence, Mutability and Power of God.Nicholas Okrent - 1998 - Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):71-84.
Abraham Cohen Herrera.Francesca di Poppa - 2009 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):491-507.
Spinoza's Identity Theory.Timothy L. S. Sprigge - 1977 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):419 – 445.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
31 ( #180,688 of 2,210,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #382,810 of 2,210,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature