Some remarks on the 'objective' and 'subjective' interpretations of the attributes

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):447 – 456 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to clarify the 'objective' and 'subjective' interpretations of Spinoza's position on the attributes of substance. It is argued that (a) the dispute between objectivists and subjectivists survives resolution of the question concerning correct translation of 'tanquam' in definition iv, Part I of the Ethics , (b) the objective interpretation, unlike the subjective one, requires rejection of the notion of 'absolute' identity, unless Spinoza's position is inconsistent, and (c) the subjective interpretation is best characterized as holding that, although each attribute constitutes the essence of substance, there is only a (Suarezean) distinction of reasoned reason (distinctio rationis ratiocinatae) between the attributes, and between any attribute and God. (Spinoza will depart from Suarez, however, in holding that there can be a distinction of reasoned reason between A and B , when the concepts of and are adequate [or clear and distinct].) The dispute is thus held -to concern Spinoza's conception of identity, and the objectivity of the distinction between the attributes, not the objectivity of the attributes themselves. A partial defense of the subjective interpretation, when conceived in the above way, is then provided.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Subjective Reasons.Eric Vogelstein - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):239-257.
The false dichotomy between objective and subjective interpretations of Spinoza's theory of attributes.Noa Shein - 2009 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (3):505 – 532.
Subjective and objective.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 207-222.
Spinoza on the Essence, Mutability and Power of God.Nicholas Okrent - 1998 - Philosophy and Theology 11 (1):71-84.
Spinoza's identity theory.Timothy L. S. Sprigge - 1977 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):419 – 445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-05

Downloads
60 (#274,310)

6 months
8 (#414,134)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Spinoza's Thinking Substance and the Necessity of Modes.Karolina Hübner - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (3):3-34.
The Two-Sense Reading of Spinoza’s definition of attribute.Ioannis Trisokkas - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (6):1093-1115.
Spinoza's Thinking Substance and the Necessity of Modes.Karolina Hübner - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (1):3-34.

Add more citations