The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):53-58 (2011)
There are enigmas of defining happiness and of discerning what it is that really makes a life go well for someone – topics that positive psychologists have not adequately addressed to date. And this is despite the fact that Ed Diener sees positive psychology as “the endeavour by scientists to answer the classic question posed by philosophers: What is the good life?” What is rarely mentioned by positive psychologists is that, depending on how the specific happiness questions are worded, they can adopt what philosophers see as radically divergent conceptions of happiness
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Conflicting Uses of 'Happiness' and the Human Condition.Stephen M. Fishman & Lucille Mccarthy - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):509-515.
Critical Remarks on Shortcuts to Happiness: The Relevance of Effort and Pain.Valérie De Prycker - 2007 - Philosophica 79.
The Pursuit of Unhappiness: The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being.M. Haybron Daniel - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Is Realism Really Bad for You? A Realistic Response Neera K. Badhwar 25th November, 2007.Neera Badhwar - unknown
Happiness, Contentment and the Good Life.Thomas L. Carson - 1981 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (4):378.
A Critique of Positive Psychology—or 'the New Science of Happiness'.Alistair Miller - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):591-608.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads54 ( #96,433 of 2,164,552 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #347,995 of 2,164,552 )
How can I increase my downloads?