Theory, Culture and Society 27 (2-3):233-253 (2010)
AbstractThis article argues that climate change produces discordances in established ways of understanding the human place in nature, and so offers unique challenges and opportunities for the interpretive social sciences. Scientific assessments such as those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change helped establish climate change as a global phenomenon, but in the process they detached knowledge from meaning. Climate facts arise from impersonal observation whereas meanings emerge from embedded experience. Climate science thus cuts against the grain of common sense and undermines existing social institutions and ethical commitments at four levels: communal, political, spatial and temporal. The article explores the tensions that arise when the impersonal, apolitical and universal imaginary of climate change projected by science comes into conflict with the subjective, situated and normative imaginations of human actors engaging with nature. It points to current environmental debates in which a reintegration of scientific representations of the climate with social responses to those representations is taking place. It suggests how the interpretive social sciences can foster a more complex understanding of humanity’s climate predicament. An important aim of this analysis is to offer a framework in which to think about the human and the social in a climate that seems to render obsolete important prior categories of solidarity and experience.
Similar books and articles
Global Justice and Global Climate Change: A Discussion of the Relationship.Duane Windsor - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:23-34.
Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. [REVIEW]James C. Wimbush & Jon M. Shepard - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (8):637 - 647.
The Relationship between International Political Community and Civil Society Concerning Environment Protection and the Struggle Against Climate Change.Valeria Barbi & Marco Borraccetti - forthcoming - Governare la Paura. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies.
Human Engineering and Climate Change.S. Matthew Liao, Anders Sandberg & Rebecca Roache - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (2):206 - 221.
CEO Ethical Leadership, Ethical Climate, Climate Strength, and Collective Organizational Citizenship Behavior.Yuhyung Shin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):299-312.
'Climategate': Paradoxical Metaphors and Political Paralysis.Brigitte Nerlich - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (4):419-442.
Global Climate Change and the Industrial Animal Agriculture Link: The Construction of Risk.Elizabeth Bristow - 2011 - Society and Animals 19 (3):205-224.
Understanding pluralism in climate modeling.Wendy Parker - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):349-368.
Justice and Climate Change: Toward a Libertarian Analysis.Dan C. Shahar - 2009 - The Independent Review 14 (2):219-237.
Chasing down the climate change footprint of the public and private sectors: Forces converge - part I.Rosemary Lyster - manuscript
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice.Sheila Jasanoff - 2017 - Big Data and Society 4 (2).
Four Problems, Four Directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward Critical Posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Neimanis, Åsberg & Hedrén - 2015 - Ethics and the Environment 20 (1):67-97.
Science, responsibility, and the philosophical imagination.Matthew Sample - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-19.
Only Resist: Feminist Ecological Citizenship and the Post‐politics of Climate Change.Sherilyn MacGregor - 2014 - Hypatia 29 (3):617-633.
Invisibility, Colors, Snow: Arctic Biosemiotics and the Violence of Climate Change.Gitte du Plessis - forthcoming - Theory, Culture and Society:026327642097679.
References found in this work
No references found.