Authors
Romy Jaster
Humboldt-University, Berlin
Abstract
Hawthorne toys with the view that ascriptions of free will are context-sensitive. But the way he formulates the view makes freedom contextualism look like a non-starter. I step into the breach for freedom contextualism. My aim is twofold. On the one hand, I argue that freedom contextualism can be motivated on the basis of our ordinary practice of freedom attribution is not ad hoc. The view explains data which cannot be accounted for by an ambiguity hypothesis. On the other hand, I suggest a more plausible freedom contextualist analysis, which emerges naturally once we pair the assumption that freedom requires that the agent could have acted otherwise with a plausible semantics of "can" statements. I'll dub the resulting view Alternate Possibilities Contextualism, or APC, for short. In contrast to Hawthorne's view, APC is well-motivated in its own right, does not beg the question against the incompatibilist and delivers a context parameter which allows for a wide range of context shifts. I conclude that, far from being a non-starter, freedom contextualism sets an agenda worth pursuing.
Keywords free will  contextualism  freedom of the will  compatibilism  incompatibilism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3196/004433020829410460
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Agents’ Abilities.Romy Jaster - 2020 - Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom in Context.Hawthorne John - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 104 (1):63-79.
Non-Elusive Freedom Contextualism.Sofia Jeppsson - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (3):793-808.
Free Will and Contextualism.Steven Rieber - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (2):223-252.
Free Will and Determinism: The Anselmian Position.Stan R. Tyvoll - 1996 - Dissertation, Saint Louis University
Are We Free to Obey the Laws?Randolph Clarke - 2010 - American Philosophical Quarterly 47 (4):389-401.
Liberdade E Vontade Em Locke.Marília Ferraz - 2009 - Filosofia Unisinos 10 (3):291-301.
Locke on the Freedom of the Will.Vere Chappell - 1994 - In G. A. J. Rogers (ed.), Locke's Philosophy: Content and Context. Oxford University Press. pp. 101--21.
Freedom, Coherence, and the Self.Laura Waddell Ekstrom - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Non‐Relativist Contextualism About Free Will.Marcus Willaschek - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):567-587.
Epistemic Freedom.J. David Velleman - 1989 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1):73-97.
Freedom as a Political Ideal.Steven Wall - 2003 - Social Philosophy and Policy 20 (2):307-334.
Pulling Oneself Up by the Hair: Understanding Nietzsche on Freedom.Claire Kirwin - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (1):82-99.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-09-11

Total views
124 ( #81,318 of 2,426,143 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #28,186 of 2,426,143 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes