Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology

Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):621-638 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scholars in science and technology studies (STS) have recently been called upon to advise governments on the design of procedures for public engagement. Any such instrumental function should be carried out consistently with STS’s interpretive and normative obligations as a social science discipline. This article illustrates how such threefold integration can be achieved by reviewing current US participatory politics against a 70-year backdrop of tacit constitutional developments in governing science and technology. Two broad cycles of constitutional adjustment are discerned: the first enlarging the scope of state action as well as public participation, with liberalized rules of access and sympathetic judicial review; the second cutting back on the role of the state, fostering the rise of an academic-industrial complex for technology transfer, and privatizing value debates through increasing delegation to professional ethicists. New rules for public engagement in the United Sates should take account of these historical developments and seek to counteract some of the anti-democratic tendencies observable in recent decades.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,560

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science and public reason.Sheila Jasanoff - 2012 - New York: Routledge.
Science, technology, and society: a sociological approach.Wenda K. Bauchspies - 2006 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Jennifer Croissant & Sal P. Restivo.
The Broad Challenge of Public Engagement in Science.Rinie Est - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):639-648.
Science, technology, and society: an introduction.Martin Bridgstock (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-31

Downloads
105 (#151,384)

6 months
8 (#155,393)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts.W. B. Gallie - 1956 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1):167-198.
W. B. Gallie’s “Essentially Contested Concepts”.W. B. Gallie - 1994 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (1):2-2.

View all 10 references / Add more references