Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):328-341 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

“Relying on Science, Romney Files Death Penalty Bill.” With that headline, a press release on April 28, 2005 announced that Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney was seeking to reintroduce by legislation the death penalty that the state's Supreme Judicial Court ruled unconstitutional in 1984. The remainder of the text left little doubt that science was a major basis for the governor's action. The press release quoted Romney as saying that the bill provided a “gold standard for the death penalty in the modern scientific age.” Positing a symmetry that will be questioned below, Romney also declared, “Just as science can free the innocent, it can also identify the guilty.” The bill itself deferred to science by calling for corroborating scientific evidence, multiple layers of review, and a novel “no doubt” standard of proof. By raising the required standard of evidence and by restricting the class of capital crimes, the proposed law hoped to correct the defects of other death penalty statutes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just Evidence: The Limits of Science in the Legal Process.Sheila Jasanoff - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):328-341.
Legal stories and the process of proof.Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):253-278.
Evidence Law Adrift.Mirjan R. Damaška - 1997 - Yale University Press.
Legal integration of Islam: a transatlantic comparison.Christian Joppke - 2013 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
6 (#1,104,159)

6 months
1 (#448,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?