Notes tow Ard a formal conversation theory

Grazer Philosophische Studien 10 (1):119-140 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Dialectic, as commonly approached, is not an analytic study, as the notion is defined in the paper. Where it is analytically approached (as, for example, by Grice and Hamblin), the result is pragmatic in nature, as well as syntactic and semantic. This paper lays the foundations of a purely formal (nonpragmatic) analysis of conversations. This study is accordingly called "Conversation Theory". The key notions of "conversation", "dialogue", "conversation game", "rules of response", "epistemic community" and "channel of informations" are defined precisely, and an analysis of how these notions fit together is given. Particular attention is given to distinguishing conversation theory from standard logic. The paper concludes by analysing a few sample conversation-games, indicating areas needing further research, by pointing out the simplification inherent in the sample games

Similar books and articles

The inner philosopher: conversations on philosophy's transformative power.Lou Marinoff - 2012 - Cambridge, Mass.: Dialogue Path Press. Edited by Daisaku Ikeda.
The Generous Listener.C. Herr - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):190-192.
Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse.Mitchell S. Green - 1995 - Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1):83 - 112.
The conversation of humanity.Stephen Mulhall - 2007 - Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Fiction and Conversation.Anniken Greve - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (3-4):238-259.


Added to PP

145 (#94,984)

6 months
33 (#50,928)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary James Jason
California State University, Fullerton

Citations of this work

The Post-Medieval 'Ars Disputandi'.Donald Leonard Felipe - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references