- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False, by Thomas Nagel
Faith and Philosophy 31 (2):236-240 (2014)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False, by Thomas Nagel.Colin McGinn - 2013 - Mind 122 (486):fzt059.
Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. By Thomas Nagel. Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 130, £15.99. ISBN-10: 0199919755. [REVIEW]Jane O'Grady - 2013 - Philosophy 88 (3):483-486.
Thomas Nagel. Mind and Cosmos.Józef Bremer - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 17 (2):269-273.
Thomas Nagel. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist and Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.Conor Cunningham - 2014 - Philosophy, Theology and the Sciences 1 (1):130.
Thomas Nagel, Mind and Cosmos. Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False.Rainer Schäfer - 2015 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 122 (1):240-243.
Thomas Nagel , Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False . Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Jim Slagle - 2013 - Philosophy in Review 33 (5):400-402.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-06-25
Downloads
58 (#297,639)
6 months
11 (#529,551)
2014-06-25
Downloads
58 (#297,639)
6 months
11 (#529,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-9b866bbb8-rpllx uwo