Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007

Historical Materialism 18 (4):189-206 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Andrew Kliman’s Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’ sets out to refute the ‘myth’ that Marx’s original presentation of the theory of the value is internally inconsistent. A century ago, Bortkiewicz purported to demonstrate that Marx’s mistake was his failure to adopt simultaneous valuation. Thereafter, twentieth-century Marxian economics worked out a ‘corrected’ version of Marx’s original theory, culminating in Steedman’s 1977 Marx after Sraffa. Conclusions Marx himself deemed central were dropped, prominently including the law of the tendential fall in the rate of profit. But simultaneous valuation is absolutely incompatible with Marx’s first and fundamental premise, the determination of value by labour-time. On the other hand, if Marx’s major theoretical conclusions do consistently follow from his premises, including the transformation of values into prices of production, then the quantitative dimension of his value-theory is internally consistent after all and stands in no need of correction on this score. Advocating a temporal, single-system interpretation, Kliman shows how ‘two simple modifications’ eliminate ‘all of the alleged inconsistencies in the quantitative dimension of Marx’s value theory’: valuation is temporal, and values and prices are determined interdependently. Kliman’s refutation is sound, but his claim to know Marx’s intentions, in E.D. Hirsch’s sense, is questionable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marx's Concept of Intrinsic Value.Andrew J. Kliman - 2000 - Historical Materialism 6 (1):89-114.
Marx's theory of value.Ulrich Steinvorth - 1977 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (4):385-396.
Review essay/understanding crime, liberalism, and science.Nick Tilley - 2003 - Criminal Justice Ethics 22 (1):50-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-15

Downloads
81 (#188,161)

6 months
4 (#315,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Jeannot
Gonzaga University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning and Significance Reinterpreted.E. D. Hirsch Jr - 1984 - Critical Inquiry 11 (2):202-225.
Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. [REVIEW]L. B. P. - 1982 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (1):186-188.

Add more references