American Political Thought 5 (1):109-131 (2016)

Authors
Alexander Jech
University of Notre Dame
Abstract
Most students of Tocqueville know of his remark, “There are three men with whom I live a little every day; they are Pascal, Montesquieu, and Rousseau.” In this paper I trace out the contours of Pascal’s influence upon Tocqueville’s understanding of the human condition and our appropriate response to it. Similar temperaments lead both Tocqueville and Pascal to emphasize human limitations and contingency, as Peter Lawler rightly emphasizes. Tocqueville and Pascal both emphasize mortality, ignorance of the most important subjects, the effects of historical contingency on what we take to be human nature, and both represent the complex internal dynamic of human nature in terms of the interplay of “angel” and “brute.” The most important difference between them concerns their relative estimates of human power and the significance of human action. Whereas the motif of human weakness is fundamental for Pascal, Tocqueville repeatedly affirms that, under the right conditions, human beings are “powerful and free.” Beginning from Pascalian premises, and endeavoring to be more faithful to some of those premises than Pascal himself was, Tocqueville aims to illuminate the possibility of an amelioration of the human condition through a “new political science” that redeems the political realm without divinizing it.
Keywords Tocqueville  Pascal
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"Tocqueville, Jansenism, and the Psychology of Freedom".Michael Locke McLendon - 2006 - American Journal of Political Science 50 (3):664-675.
The Conversion of Enlightenment.Matthew William Maguire - 1999 - Dissertation, Harvard University
The Strange Belief of Alexis de Tocqueville: Christianity as Philosophy.Luk Sanders - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 74 (1):33-53.
Tocqueville on the Nature of Federalism.David Broyles - 1993 - In Peter Augustine Lawler & Joseph Alulis (eds.), Tocqueville's Defense of Human Liberty: Current Essays. Garland. pp. 297--320.
Reconsidering Tocqueville's Imperialism.Demin Duan - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (3):415.
De Tocqueville.Cheryl Welch - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Tocqueville and Socialism.Daniel Mahoney - 1993 - In Peter Augustine Lawler & Joseph Alulis (eds.), Tocqueville's Defense of Human Liberty: Current Essays. Garland.
Intimate Rebellion. Pascal on the Impotence of Man.Vincent Caudron - 2014 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 76 (3):503-525.
Tocqueville and Arendt on the Novelty of Modern Tyranny.Roger Boesche - 1993 - In Peter Augustine Lawler & Joseph Alulis (eds.), Tocqueville's Defense of Human Liberty: Current Essays. Garland. pp. 157--75.
Blaise Pascal on Skepticism and Order.Virgil Martin Nemoianu - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-08

Total views
112 ( #84,888 of 2,362,053 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #18,304 of 2,362,053 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes