Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496 (2002)
AbstractLogicism Lite counts number‐theoretical laws as logical for the same sort of reason for which physical laws are counted as as empirical: because of the character of the data they are responsible to. In the case of number theory these are the data verifying or falsifying the simplest equations, which Logicism Lite counts as true or false depending on the logical validity or invalidity of first‐order argument forms in which no numbertheoretical notation appears.
Similar books and articles
Russell’s Reasons for Logicism.Ian Proops - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
Ed Zalta's Version of Neo-Logicism: A Friendly Letter of Complaint.Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg - 2009 - In Hannes Leitgeb & Alexander Hieke (eds.), Reduction – Abstraction – Analysis. Ontos. pp. 11--305.
The Auto-Lite Strike and the Fight Against Wage Slavery.Rebecca E. Zietlow & James Gray Pope - manuscript
On The Sense and Reference of A Logical Constant.Harold Hodes - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):134-165.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science.Carol E. Cleland - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):551-582.
Historical Science, Over- and Underdetermined: A Study of Darwin’s Inference of Origins.Aviezer Tucker - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):805-829.
Terra Incognita: Explanation and Reduction in Earth Science.Maarten G. Kleinhans, Chris J. J. Buskes & Henk W. de Regt - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):289 – 317.
When Science Studies Religion: Six Philosophy Lessons for Science Classes.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (1):49-67.