Objective Styles in Northern Field Science

Authors
Jeff Kochan
Universität Konstanz
Abstract
Social studies of science have often treated natural field sites as extensions of the laboratory. But this overlooks the unique specificities of field sites. While lab sites are usually private spaces with carefully controlled borders, field sites are more typically public spaces with fluid boundaries and diverse inhabitants. Field scientists must therefore often adapt their work to the demands and interests of local agents. I propose to address the difference between lab and field in sociological terms, as a difference in style. A field style treats epistemic alterity as a resource rather than an obstacle for objective knowledge production. A sociological stylistics of the field should thus explain how objective science can co-exist with radical conceptual difference. I discuss examples from the Canadian North, focussing on collaborations between state wildlife biologists and managers, on the one hand, and local Aboriginal Elders and hunters, on the other. I argue that a sociological stylistics of the field can help us to better understand how radically diverse agents may collaborate across cultures in the successful production of reliable natural knowledge.
Keywords field sciences  styles of reasoning  cross-cultural science  incommensurability  epistemic neighbourliness  postcolonial science studies
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.04.001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,023
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Hacking’s Historical Epistemology: A Critique of Styles of Reasoning.Martin Kusch - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):158-173.
'Style' for Historians and Philosophers.Ian Hacking - 1992 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (1):1-20.
'Language, Truth and Reason' 30years Later.Ian Hacking - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (4):599-609.
Latour's Heidegger.Jeff Kochan - 2010 - Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Astrid Schwarz: Experiments in Practice.Marcel Boumans - 2015 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 46 (1):237-240.
Bloor, Latour, and the Field.E. Seguin - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):503-508.
A Place That Answers Questions: Primatological Field Sites and the Making of Authentic Observations.Amanda Rees - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (2):311-333.
State of the Field: Transient Underdetermination and Values in Science.Justin Biddle - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):124-133.
The Global and Beyond: Adventures in the Local Historiographies of Science.Carla Nappi - 2013 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 104:102-110.
Laski, Harold J., The State in Theory and Practice.Field Field - 1935 - Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 4:301.
On Field's Argument for Substantivalism.Jerzy Gołosz - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (1):5 – 16.
Parmelee, Maurice, Bolshevism, Fascism, and the Liberal Democratic State.Field Field - 1935 - Studies in Philosophy and Social Science 4:301.
Science as Practice and Culture.Andrew Pickering (ed.) - 1992 - University of Chicago Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-05-16

Total downloads
48 ( #130,692 of 2,275,410 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #218,253 of 2,275,410 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature