‘Terminal Anorexia’, treatment refusal and decision making capacity

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whether anorexic patients should be able to refuse treatment when this potentially has a fatal outcome is a vexed topic. A recent proposal for a new category of ‘terminal anorexia’ suggests criteria when a move to palliative care or even physician assisted suicide might be justified. I argue that this proposed diagnosis presents a false sense of certainty of the illness trajectory by conceptualizing anorexia in analogy with physical disorders and stressing the effects of starvation. Furthermore, this conceptualization is in conflict with the claim that individuals who meet the diagnostic criteria for terminal anorexia have decision making capacity. It should therefore be rejected.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Decision making capacity should not be decisive in emergencies.Dieneke Hubbeling - 2014 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17 (2):229-238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-03

Downloads
70 (#247,131)

6 months
70 (#93,072)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anneli Jefferson
Cardiff University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references