History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 42 (3):1-24 (2020)
AbstractIt has become customary in multilevel selection theory to use the same terms to denote both two explanatory goals and two explanatory means. This paper spells out some of the benefits that derive from avoiding this terminological conflation. I argue that keeping explanatory means and goals well apart allows us to see that, contrary to a popular recent idea, Price’s equation and contextual analysis—the statistical methods most extensively used for measuring the effects of certain evolutionary factors on the change in the focal individual trait in multilevel selection scenarios—do not come with built-in notions of group selection and, therefore, the efficacy of these methods at analyzing various kinds of cases does not constitute a basis for deciding how group selection should best be defined. Moreover, contrary to another widely accepted idea, I argue that more than one type of group selection may serve as explanatory means when one’s goal is that of explaining the evolution of individual traits in multilevel selection scenarios and I spell out how this explanatory role should be understood.
Similar books and articles
Local Interaction, Multilevel Selection, and Evolutionary Transitions.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2006 - Biological Theory 1 (4):372-380.
Alternative formulations of multilevel selection.John Damuth & I. Lorraine Heisler - 1988 - Biology and Philosophy 3 (4):407-430.
Multilevel Modeling and the Explanatory Autonomy of Psychology.Wei Fang - 2020 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 50 (3):175-194.
Probabilistic causation and the explanatory role of natural selection.Pablo Razeto-Barry & Ramiro Frick - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (3):344-355.
Explanatory Justice: The Case of Disjunctive Explanations.Michael Cohen - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (3):442-454.
Why one model is never enough: a defense of explanatory holism.Hochstein Eric - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1105-1125.
Hierarchical approach to replication and selection.Alexei A. Sharov - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):905-906.
The Phenomenological Status of the Theory of Natural Selection.Santiago Ginnobili - 2011 - Ideas Y Valores 60 (145):69–86.
The Nature of Darwin’s Support for the Theory of Natural Selection.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):112-129.
The evolution of failure: explaining cancer as an evolutionary process.Christopher Lean & Anya Plutynski - 2016 - Biology and Philosophy 31 (1):39-57.
Multilevel Selection and the Theory of Evolution: Historical and Conceptual Issues.Ciprian Jeler (ed.) - 2018 - Cham: Springer Verlag.
A Note Against the Use of “Belonging To” Properties in Multilevel Selection Theory.Ciprian Jeler - 2020 - Acta Biotheoretica 69 (3):377-390.
Explanatory relevance across disciplinary boundaries: the case of neuroeconomics.Jaakko Kuorikoski & Petri Ylikoski - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2):219–228.
Inference to the best explanation, coherence and other explanatory virtues.Adolfas Mackonis - 2013 - Synthese 190 (6):975-995.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus.Elliott Sober - 1984 - University of Chicago Press.
The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection of the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.Charles Darwin - 1859 - San Diego: Norton.
The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1992 - Noûs 26 (1):132-133.