Kraj povijesti ili nova epoha?

Metodicki Ogledi 15 (2):79-85 (2008)

Abstract
Autor svoj članak počinje analizom termina Kraj, te u svezi s time analizira problem kraja povijesti u Hegelovoj filozofiji povijesti. Središnji dio rada bavi se Nietzscheovim promišljanjem povijesti, koje je imalo veliki utjecaj na suvremenu filozofiju povijesti. Prihvaćajući Nietzscheovu argumentaciju, autor tvrdi da nije na svome kraju povijest, nego samo jedna interpretacija povijesti. Preko Adorna, Foucaulta i Vattima autor otvara niz pitanja vezanih uz problematiku socijalne filozofije i bioetike. Autor zaključuje da će kapitalizam vjerojatno i postati globalni sustav proizvodnje i razmjene, ali da Zapad i vrijednosti na kojima je zasnovan gotovo sigurno neće biti globalna civilizacija.The author begins his article with the analysis of the term End and with regard to this he analyses the issue of the end of history in Hegel’s philosophy of history. The main body of the article deals with Nietzsche’s reflection of history, which has had a big impact on the contemporary philosophy of history. Accepting Nietzsche’s arguments, the author claims that it is not the end of history but rather an interpretation of it. Citing Adorno, Fucault and Vattimo the author tackles a number of issues regarding the problems of social philosophy and bioethics. He concludes that capitalism will probably become a global system of production and trade, but the West and its values will almost surely not be a global civilization
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,873
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kakvo znanje trebamo?Vladimir Jelkić - 2011 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 31 (2):255-261.
Lirski subjekt i filozofija povijesti.Vladimir Jelkić - 2012 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 32 (2):313-326.
Slobodno vrijeme i sloboda.Milenko A. Perović - 2009 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 29 (2):245-254.
Smisao Petrićeva mita o povijesti.Stjepan Špoljarić - 2010 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 30 (3):413-430.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-31

Total views
0

Recent downloads (6 months)
0

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes