Conferralism and Intersectionality: A Response to Ásta’s Categories We Live By

Journal of Social Ontology 5 (2):261-272 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The conferralist account of social properties that Ásta develops and defends in Categories We Live By is persuasive in many ways. Conferralism could however do better, by its own lights, at handling the phenomenon of intersectionality. This paper first suggests a friendly amendment to the schema for conferrals that Asta offers. This helps to explain the difficulty concerning intersectionality. Finally, the paper suggests a way of developing the conferralist account that would resolve this difficulty.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,560

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Categories We Do Not Know We Live By.Åsa Burman - 2019 - Journal of Social Ontology 5 (2):235-243.
Précis: Categories We Live By. Ásta - 2019 - Journal of Social Ontology 5 (2):229-233.
Making Up Peoples? Conferralism about Nationality.Behrensen Maren - 2018 - Journal of Social Ontology 4 (1):29-51.
The metaphysics of intersectionality.Sara Bernstein - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (2):321-335.
Essentiality conferred.Ásta Sveinsdóttir - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):135 - 148.
Re-thinking Intersectionality.Jennifer C. Nash - 2008 - Feminist Review 89 (1):1-15.
Reinvigorating Intersectionality as a Provisional Concept.Anna Carastathis - 2014 - In Namita Goswami, Maeve O'Donovan & Lisa Yount (eds.), Why Race and Gender Still Matter: An Intersectional Approach. Pickering & Chatto. pp. 59-70.


Added to PP

77 (#193,864)

6 months
21 (#99,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?