Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1052-1062 (2003)

Eric Scerri and other authors have acknowledged that the reality of chemical orbitals is not compatible with quantum mechanics. Recently, however, Scerri and Sharon Crasnow have argued that if chemists cannot consider orbitals as real entities, then chemistry is in danger of being reduced to physics. I argue that the question of the existence of orbitals is best viewed as an issue of explanation, not metaphysics: In many chemically important cases orbitals do not make sufficiently accurate predictions, and must be replaced. Chemists and physicists can acknowledge this fact while maintaining the utility of orbitals and the autonomy of chemistry.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2003
DOI 10.1086/377388
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,564
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Orbitals Do Not Exist?Martín Labarca & Olimpia Lombardi - 2010 - Foundations of Chemistry 12 (2):149-157.
On the Alleged Non-Existence of Orbitals.Peter Mulder - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (2):178-182.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
102 ( #117,654 of 2,533,574 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #261,212 of 2,533,574 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes