Filosofiska Notiser 2 (1):39-45 (2015)

Authors
Sofia M.I. Jeppsson
Umeå University
Abstract
Saul Smilansky’s theory of free will and moral responsibility consists of two parts; dualism and illusionism. Dualism is the thesis that both compatibilism and hard determinism are partly true, and has puzzled many philosophers. I argue that Smilansky’s dualism can be given an unquestionably coherent and comprehensible interpretation if we reformulate it in terms of pro tanto reasons. Dualism so understood is the thesis that respect for persons gives us pro tanto reasons to blame wrongdoers, and also pro tanto reasons not to blame them. These reasons must be we ighed against each other (and against relevant consequentialist reasons) in order to find out what we all things considered ought to do.
Keywords Smilansky  dualism  moral responsibility
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice for Hedgehogs.Ronald Dworkin - 2011 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Living Without Free Will.Derk Pereboom - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Free Will and Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2000 - Oxford University Press.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Morally, We Should Prefer to Exist: A Response to Smilansky.Sean Johnson - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):817-821.
Is Praying for the Morally Impermissible Morally Permissible?Daniel Peterson - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (3):254-264.
Free Will and Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Free Will, Fundamental Dualism,and the Centrality of Illusion.Saul Smilansky - 2002 - In Robert H. Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford University Press. pp. 489-505.
Recipes for Moral Paradox.Andrew Sneddon - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1):43-54.
Free Will and Respect for Persons.Saul Smilansky - 2005 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):248-261.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-20

Total views
21 ( #537,187 of 2,518,717 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #40,872 of 2,518,717 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes