Perspectives on Science 15 (4):410-433 (2007)

Authors
Douglas Jesseph
University of South Florida
Abstract
This paper deals with the very different attitudes that Descartes and Pascal had to the cycloid—the curve traced by the motion of a point on the periphery of a circle as the circle rolls across a right line. Descartes insisted that such a curve was merely mechanical and not truly geometric, and so was of no real mathematical interest. He nevertheless responded to enquiries from Mersenne, who posed the problems of determining its area and constructing its tangent. Pascal, in contrast, saw the cycloid as a paradigm of geometric intelligibility, and he made it the focus of a series of challenge problems he posed to the mathematical world in 1658. After dealing with some of the history of the cycloid , I trace this difference in attitude to an underlying difference in the mathematical epistemologies of Descartes and Pascal. For Descartes, the truly geometric is that which can be expressed in terms of finite ratios between right lines, which in turn are expressible as closed polynomial equations. As Descartes pointed out, this means that ratios between straight and curved lines are not geometrically admissible, and curves that require them must be banished from geometry. Pascal, in contrast, thought that the scope of geometry included curves such as the cycloid, which are to be studied by employing infinitesimal methods and ratios between curved and straight lines
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc.2007.15.4.410
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,513
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Patterns of Mathematical Thought in the Later Seventeenth Century.Derek Thomas Whiteside - 1961 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 1 (3):179-388.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cartesian Truth.Thomas C. Vinci - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
.[author unknown] - unknown
Descartes' Epistemology.Lex Newman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
Cómo resolver la problemática pirrónica: lo que se aprende de Descartes.Ernesto Sosa - 1996 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):7-26.
A Case Study in the Application of Mathematics to Physics: Descartes' Principles of Philosophy, Part II.Emily R. Grosholz - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:116 - 124.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
60 ( #176,602 of 2,446,469 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #456,659 of 2,446,469 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes