Frege's notions of self-evidence

Mind 110 (440):937-976 (2001)
Controversy remains over exactly why Frege aimed to estabish logicism. In this essay, I argue that the most influential interpretations of Frege's motivations fall short because they misunderstand or neglect Frege's claims that axioms must be self-evident. I offer an interpretation of his appeals to self-evidence and attempt to show that they reveal a previously overlooked motivation for establishing logicism, one which has roots in the Euclidean rationalist tradition. More specifically, my view is that Frege had two notions of self-evidence. One notion is that of a truth being foundationally secure, yet not grounded on any other truth. The second notion is that of a truth that requires only clearly grasping its content for rational, a priori justified recognition of its truth. The overarching thesis I develop is that Frege required that axioms be self-evident in both senses, and he relied on judging propositions to be self-evident as part of his fallibilist method for identifying a foundation of arithmetic. Consequently, we must recognize both notions in order to understand how Frege construes ultimate foundational proofs, his methodology for discovering and identifying such proofs, and why he thought the propositions of arithmetic required proof.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/110.440.937
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,233
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Composition of Thoughts.Richard Heck & Robert May - 2011 - Noûs 45 (1):126-166.
Frege and the Paradox of Analysis.Michael Nelson - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):159-181.
Frege on Definitions.Sanford Shieh - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):992-1012.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Frege on Definitions.Sanford Shieh - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):992-1012.
Frege and Semantics.Richard Heck - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):27-63.
Frege's Elucidatory Holism.Clinton Tolley - 2011 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (3):226-251.
Frege's New Science.G. Aldo Antonelli & Robert C. May - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):242-270.
On Frege's Two Notions of Sense.Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock - 1986 - History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):31-41.
Evidence, Judgment and Truth.Verena Mayer - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):175-197.
Frege on Knowing the Foundation.Tyler Burge - 1998 - Mind 107 (426):305-347.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

73 ( #72,283 of 2,172,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #172,512 of 2,172,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums