Law and Gospel, or the Law of the Gospel? Karl Barth's Political Theology Compared with Luther and Calvin

Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):181 - 205 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This essay is an attempt to understand the significance of Barth's redefinition of the "law/gospel" rubric for political theology. Barth's thought is exposited at length, and illumined by comparison with Luther and Calvin. Luther emphasizes the distance between gospel and the law, distinguishing between serving God in the secular regiment, and serving Christ in the spiritual regiment. He thereby challenges the improper relation of state and church, but does so in a manner that can lead to a passive dualism. Calvin holds that preaching the law to the state includes preaching the gospel; thus, the church has a positive vision against which it can evaluate the state's service to God in Christ. This leads, however, to the danger of a 'clerical guardianship' of the state. Barth finds a positive connection between the two governments in the fact that both communities are based in Christ, in whom the gospel is their law. This grounds his high view of the state as predecessor to the heavenly kingdom, as well as a prophetic mission of the church to the state. This does not lead to a new Christendom, however, first, because Barth hopes not for a kingdom wrought by human hands, but for the Theocracy of God, and second, because Barth sees the fallen reality of both church and state, the state pagan and violent, and the church a poor witness. In the end, though Barth makes a strong case for supporting theological critique of the state, while avoiding Constantinianism, he is unable to solve the problem of how to connect the gospel and the law in the civil community



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,980

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rediscovering the natural law in Reformed theological ethics.Stephen John Grabill - 2006 - Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Karl Barth and Ramsey's "Uses of Power".Oliver O'Donovan - 1991 - Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):1 - 30.
The hastening that waits: Karl Barth's ethics.Nigel Biggar - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The analogy of grace: Karl Barth's moral theology.Gerald McKenny - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Common actualization: Karl Barth's recovery and reappropriation of the communication of natures.Darren O. Sumner - 2011 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (4):465-479.
Calvin at the Centre.Paul Helm - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
What Is the Gospel?Charles H. Giblin - 1970 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 45 (2):213-234.
Law and conscience.Franz Böckle - 1966 - New York,: Sheed & Ward.
Pannenberg’s Understanding of the Natural Law.B. Hoon Woo - 2012 - Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (3):346-366.


Added to PP

21 (#574,333)

6 months
2 (#332,693)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jesse Couenhoven
Villanova University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references