David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Acta Biotheoretica 32 (2):79-92 (1983)
In biology, man is an object of research; therefore the question might be asked whether inspirations can go from biological data to the reflections on the mind-matter relation in man. The social aspect of man, as treated by sociobiology, is left out of consideration. The knowledge that man is mind, or has a mind, is no result of biological research. It is a datum from philosophy. The biologist, however, is living in a culture which knows about the mental character of man, and this is incorporated in his investigations. He knows that mental activities are connected with processes in the central nervous system and that, especially in the brain, localizations of mental activities are found. As a result of the split-brain experiments with patients and animals, some have arrived at the conclusion that there is a double consciousness.An approach from biology can lead to statements of a philosophical character, as, for example, statements about the unity, or even identity, of mind and matter. The theories of identity meet with great interest in scientific circles, and the truth value of identity statements is investigated. The system theory is taken into consideration. On a philosophical level a revaluation of the concept of matter can lead to a different sort of identity theory.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jerry A. Fodor (1981). The Mind-Body Problem. Scientific American 244:114-25.
Thomas Nagel (1965). Physicalism. Philosophical Review 74 (July):339-56.
John C. Eccles (1974). Cerebral Activity and Consciousness. In F. Ayala & T. Dobzhansky (eds.), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. University of California Press. pp. 87.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. Scheele (2002). Never Mind the Gap: The Explanatory Gap as an Artifact of Naive Philosophical Argument. Philosophical Psychology 15 (3):333-342.
W. Teed Rockwell (1994). On What the Mind is Identical With. Philosophical Psychology 7 (3):307-23.
Clive Vernon Borst (1970). The Mind-Brain Identity Theory: A Collection of Papers. New York: St Martin's P..
Harald Atmanspacher, Mind and Matter as Asymptotically Disjoint, Inequivalent Representations with Broken.
H. Groot (1936). Het Wezen Van de Materie. Synthese 1 (1):247 - 251.
James Baillie (1991). Split Brains and Single Minds. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:11-18.
A. G. Cairns-Smith (1996). Evolving the Mind: On the Nature of Matter and the Origin of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Bertrand Russell (1926). Abstracts of Some Lectures Perception. Philosophy 1 (1):78.
J. J. C. Smart (2007). The Mind/Brain Identity Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #381,617 of 1,925,268 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #418,236 of 1,925,268 )
How can I increase my downloads?