Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (5):557-593 (2003)
This paper deals with a series of semantic contrasts between the copula be and the preposition as, two functional elements that both head elementary predication structures. It will be argued that the meaning of as is a type lowering device shifting the meaning of its complement NP from the type of generalized quantifiers to the type of properties (where properties are conceived as relations between individuals and situations), while the copula be induces a type coercion from (partial) situations to (total) possible worlds. Paired with van der Sandt's (1992) theory of presupposition accommodation, these assumptions will account for the observed contrasts between as and be.
|Keywords||Formal semantics Discourse Representation Theory Presuppositions Underspecification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
“Two Be or Not Two Be”: Identity, Predication and the Welsh Copula. [REVIEW]Laurie Zaring - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (2):103 - 142.
Theories of Properties, Relations, and Propositions.George Bealer - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (11):634-648.
John Buridan and Jerónimo Pardo on the Notion of Propositio.Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe - 2003 - In R. L. Friedman & S. Ebbesen (eds.), John Buridan and Beyond. Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters. pp. 89--153.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #131,650 of 2,164,296 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,296 )
How can I increase my downloads?