Springer Verlag (2019)
Authors |
|
Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) |
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
Buy this book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
ISBN(s) | 9783030132996 978-3-030-13299-6 978-3-030-13300-9 3030133028 3030132994 |
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-13300-9 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options

Conclusion
The history of the correspondence principle presented in this book has followed a theoretical tool and its use in many strands of research embedded in the patchwork of problems of quantum physics during the 1920s. In these highly local contexts, the implementation of the correspondence principle led... see more
Copenhagen Reactions: The Intensity Problem in Copenhagen, 1924–1925
After the discussion of the applications of the correspondence principle in Munich, Breslau and Göttingen, the final chapter of this book returns to Copenhagen. It studies how physicists around Niels Bohr approached the multiplet intensity problem and its relation to the correspondence principle. Ba... see more
That I Cannot Conceive of After the Results of Your Dissertation: Fritz Reiche and the F-sum Rule
This chapter discusses the work of Fritz Reiche on the quantum theory of radiation and his application of the correspondence principle in the context of dispersion theory. Following his private correspondence with Kramers in 1923 and 1924, I reconstruct Reiche’s attempts to determine transition prob... see more
Fertilizer on a Sandy Acreage: Franck, Hund and the Ramsauer Effect
The applications of the correspondence principle to multiplet spectroscopy, discussed in the previous chapter, presented an extension and rather radical adaptation of the correspondence principle in its original domain of atomic spectroscopy. The present chapter focuses on a research field that was ... see more
Using the Magic Wand: Sommerfeld, Multiplet Intensities and the Correspondence Principle
This chapter discusses Arnold Sommerfeld’s research on the intensity problem for multiplets and his application of the correspondence principle in the context of atomic spectroscopy, which he developed in collaboration with his students Werner Heisenberg and Helmut Hönl. The analysis is based on pub... see more
The Correspondence Principle in the Quantum Network 1918–1926
The discussion in the preceding chapter focused almost entirely on Bohr and his thinking about quantum theory. But how was Bohr’s correspondence argument received within the quantum network? When and how did his peers take up the principle in their work and develop their own applications? This chapt... see more
The Correspondence Principle in Copenhagen 1913–1923: Origin, Formulation and Consolidation
This chapter discusses the work of Niels Bohr and Hendrik Antoon Kramers on the quantum theory of the atom in relation to the correspondence principle. Within the main argument of this book, this chapter plays a pivotal role. It presents a historical analysis of the genesis of the principle and prov... see more
Introduction
In the summer of 1923, Niels BohrBohr, Niels gave a lecture at Harvard University on the quantum theory of the atom. He had done so many times during the 1920s in Germany, Britain, the Netherlands, and now also in the U.S. For almost 300 listeners in the audience, BohrBohr, Niels’s presentation was ... see more
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle.Hans Radder - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):195-226.
Why We Don’T Need Quantum Planetary Dynamics: Decoherence and the Correspondence Principle for Chaotic Systems.Wojciech Zurek & Juan Paz - 1999 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 7:167-177.
A Kantian Interpretation of Niels Bohr's Early Correspondence Principle: 1917-1924.Roberto Angeloni - 2017 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 10 (1):8-24.
From Correspondence to Complementarity: The Emergence of Bohr's Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.Scott Daniel Tanona - 2002 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Re-Formulating The Generalized Correspondence Principle.Michael Shaffer - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):99-115.
Idealization and Formalism in Bohr’s Approach to Quantum Theory.Scott Tanona - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):683-695.
Inter-Theory Relations in Quantum Gravity: Correspondence, Reduction, and Emergence.Karen Crowther - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.
On the Verge of Umdeutung in Minnesota: Van Vleck and the Correspondence Principle.Anthony Duncan & Michel Janssen - unknown
The Incongruent Correspondence: Seven Non-Classical Years of Old Quantum Theory.Shahin Kaveh - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (2):239-246.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-06-21
Total views
1 ( #1,459,607 of 2,410,110 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,624 of 2,410,110 )
2019-06-21
Total views
1 ( #1,459,607 of 2,410,110 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,624 of 2,410,110 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.