Fraud, Enforcement Action, and the Role of Corporate Governance: Evidence from China

Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):561-576 (2009)

Abstract
We examine enforcement action in China’s emerging markets by focusing on the agents that impose this action and the role played by supervisory boards. Using newly available databases, we find that supervisory boards play an active role when Chinese listed companies face enforcement action. Listed firms with larger supervisory boards are more likely to have more severe sanctions imposed upon them by the China Security Regulatory Commission, and listed companies that face more severe enforcement actions have more supervisory board meetings. Our findings are of interest, as supervisory boards in China are generally perceived to be dysfunctional. This study contributes to the existing literature in three ways. First, we shed light on the effects of supervisory boards whose role in a fraud setting has not yet been examined. Second, the study has important policy implications for governance reform. Finally, our analyses provide the most up-to-date picture of fraud and governance issues in China’s ever-growing markets
Keywords corporate governance  enforcement  fraud  supervisory boards
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-009-0061-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,545
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud in China.Martin J. Conyon & Lerong He - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 134 (4):669-691.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Securities Market and Corporate Governance of Privatised Firms.Viet Ha Hoang - 2006 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 2 (s 3-4):254-279.
Ethics, Corporations, and Governance.Wesley Cragg & Dirk Matten - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):1-4.
Corporate Governance and Trust in Business: A Matter of Balance.G. J. Rossouw - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1.
Corporate Governance in South Africa.G. J. Rossouw, A. Van der Watt & D. P. Malan - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):289 - 302.
Ethical Issues in the Evolution Ofcorporate Governance in China.OnKit Tam - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):303 - 320.
Why are there Differences in Corporate Governance Among the Listed Companies?[author unknown] - 2008 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:34-44.
Corporate Governance in South Africa.G. J. Rossouw, A. van der Watt & D. P. Malan Rossouw - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):289 - 302.
Governance and Social Information Disclosure Evidence From the UK.Sepideh Parsa, Reza Kouhy & Christos Tzovas - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (3):205-222.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-03-28

Total views
35 ( #214,773 of 2,325,363 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #139,294 of 2,325,363 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature