Authors
Tao Jiang
Rutgers University - New Brunswick
Abstract
This essay looks into a particular aspect of Sinological challenge to the modern project of Chinese philosophy within the Western academy through the lens of authorship, using the Zhuangzi 莊子 as a case study. It explores philosophical implications for texts whose authorship is in doubt and develops a new heuristic model of authorship and textuality, so that a more robust intellectual space for the philosophical discourse on Chinese classics can be carved out from the dominant historicist Sinological discourse. It argues that philosophical and Sinological approaches to Chinese classics have divergent scholarly objectives and follow different disciplinary norms. To clarify such divergence, it proposes a heuristic model to distinguish two sets of scholarly objects operative in Sinology and philosophy respectively, namely original text versus inherited text, historical author versus textual author, and authorial intent versus textual intent. These two sets of scholarly objects are related, at times overlapping but often irreducibly distinct, with the former in the pairs belonging to Sinologists and the latter to philosophers
Keywords Original/Inherited text  Historical/Textual author  Authorial/Textual intent
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11712-015-9473-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Critique of Imperial Reason: Lessons From the Zhuangzi.Dorothy H. B. Kwek - 2019 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 18 (3):411-433.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Annotations.Edwin Lowe - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):259-259.
Interpretation and the Problem of Authorial Intention.Burhanettin Tatar - 1998 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America
Extraneous Voices: Orphaned and Adopted Texts in the Protagoras.Ryan Drake - 2005 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):1-20.
The Reuse of Texts in Indian Philosophy: Introduction.Elisa Freschi - 2015 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 43 (2-3):85-108.
Who is the Author of Halakhah?Ugo Volli - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):191-210.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-01-11

Total views
21 ( #518,008 of 2,455,415 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,315 of 2,455,415 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes